{"id":9079,"date":"2017-02-24T05:06:08","date_gmt":"2017-02-24T05:06:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.3dprinterbank.com\/?p=9079"},"modified":"2017-02-24T05:06:08","modified_gmt":"2017-02-24T05:06:08","slug":"simplify3ds-repair-functions-arent-too-great-simplify3d-removes-a-lot-of-materialmesh-when-slicing-a-model-with-screenshots-best-fix-is-using-separate-connected-surfaces","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.3dprinterbank.com\/?p=9079","title":{"rendered":"Simplify3d&#8217;s repair functions aren&#8217;t too great. Simplify3d removes a lot of material\/mesh when slicing a model (with screenshots). Best fix is using &#8220;separate connected surfaces.&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div><img src='https:\/\/ifttt.com\/images\/no_image_card.png' style='max-width:600px;' \/><\/p>\n<div>So, I&#8217;m in the process of printing this Iron Man suit from Thingiverse. Some of the models have needed small holes filled over the course of things, but this one particular model didn&#8217;t appear to need it at first. In Simplify3d it initially shows it as one solid model. I printed the model out without glancing at the gcode preview, and found a LOT of holes. When going back to the gcode preview, I found out that Simplify3d actually caused the issue and not my printer. Here are some screenshots of the two largest culprits I&#8217;ve tried using all of the repair settings; nothing finds any issues, except the &#8220;find self intersecting surfaces&#8221; but I see no way to fix that.After realizing that all of my problem areas are &#8220;self-intersecting surfaces&#8221; I did a bit more playing around. The &#8220;heal&#8221; and &#8220;merge all outlines into a single solid model&#8221; functions were next to useless and didn&#8217;t help much. Then I googled around a bit, and found out that by going to &#8220;mesh&#8221; and &#8220;separate connected surfaces&#8221; Simplify3d won&#8217;t spread all of the parts like a program like Cura would. It actually kept them all aligned&#8230;I went to the print preview and, eureka! The preview showed me exactly what I wanted to see, and appeared to have good connections\/infill with all of the &#8220;split&#8221; parts. I at first had the &#8220;merge all outlines&#8221; setting checked, but that ended up filling in even the holes that I need to have open&#8230;with it unchecked everything seems fine.Sorry for my wordiness; this post started off as a request for help, but I ended up solving the problem on my own as I was typing. I&#8217;m hoping that this will help anyone else having this same problem.TL;DR When Simplify3d decides to add a bunch of holes to your model because of &#8220;self intersecting surfaces&#8221; then all you need to do is simply use the &#8220;separate connected surfaces&#8221; option, don&#8217;t move anything around, and uncheck the &#8220;merge all outlines into single model&#8221; option if your model has any planned holes in it. http:\/\/ift.tt\/2mdGun6<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So, I&#8217;m in the process of printing this Iron Man suit from Thingiverse. Some of the models have needed small holes filled over the course of things, but this one particular model didn&#8217;t appear to need it at first. In Simplify3d it initially shows it as one solid model. I printed the model out without &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.3dprinterbank.com\/?p=9079\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Simplify3d&#8217;s repair functions aren&#8217;t too great. Simplify3d removes a lot of material\/mesh when slicing a model (with screenshots). Best fix is using &#8220;separate connected surfaces.&#8221;&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[7,8,9],"class_list":["post-9079","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-3dprinters","tag-3dprinting","tag-discussion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.3dprinterbank.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9079","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.3dprinterbank.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.3dprinterbank.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.3dprinterbank.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.3dprinterbank.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9079"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.3dprinterbank.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9079\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9080,"href":"http:\/\/www.3dprinterbank.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9079\/revisions\/9080"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.3dprinterbank.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.3dprinterbank.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9079"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.3dprinterbank.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}